In my opinion, defensive systems

  • Leader
    October 24, 2022 9:38 PM EDT
    I’ve about had it with the two traditional systems FUT 23 Coins , legacy defending and tactical defending. When tactical defending was introduced in an effort to counter second-pressure abusers, the intentions were pure but the implementation left a lot to be desired, mainly that your AI teammates never even attempt a tackle. Containing is an important part of defending, especially out-wide, but in the middle of the park where the concentration of numbers is at its highest, it makes little sense in this day and age of pressing.

    Liverpool, Chelsea, Dortmund and even the Spurs at times utilize systems where they close down opponents very quickly to varying degrees of success. While legacy defending will allow you to press as a team, the angles at which your teammates press make it easy for them to be beaten, either by a dribble or pass. Not only that, but it’s hard at times to not press that button and ruin your own defensive shape. Tactical defending does a good job at keeping your lines (if you’re using a 4-3-3 formation your three in midfield will split the field horizontally with equal spacing between them) the passiveness allows your opponents time on the ball to pick the best option.

    In my opinion, defensive systems and styles should be team- and tactics-specific, meaning that a combination of on-the-fly instructions + team tactics + player instructions should equal or define your defensive style buy FIFA 23 Coins . And, given FIFA’s expansive tactical systems with multiple formation options, you would have the ability to defend as you please in this system. If I want to set it up like a lot of teams by playing a high-press style (legacy defending) for the opening 30 minutes before dropping back into a solid defensive shape (tactical defending) to preserve energy, I should be able to do that.